Proposed Lyme School Budget: 6 January 2025

At the Budget Committee meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 8 January 2025, the Lyme School Board will present their next version of the school budget for the 2025-2026 school year.

I plan to ask the following questions at that meeting:

  • Two years ago, the School Board Finance Committee made a presentation to this board that asserted, in part, “…the future trajectory of growth in the school budget will not be sustainable.” (page 19). What measures is the school using to achieve sustainability in the budget? 
  • Would you explain the role of the Academic Director, and how it has changed from the time it was instituted when Mr. Valance became both principal and superintendent?
  • Given that the school district consumes almost 75% of the property tax dollars raised from Lyme residents, what measures is the School Board taking to ensure that families of its students who are most financially-stressed can afford to remain in Lyme?
FY26-Budget-Run-1-6-25


Feel free to share this post on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, or email. Any opinions expressed here are solely my own, and not those of any public body, such as the Lyme Planning Board, Budget Committee, or Trustees of the Trust Funds where I volunteer. I would be interested to hear your thoughts – you can reach me at richb.lyme@gmail.com.

Petitioned amendment re: propane tanks

We sent the following letter to the Lyme Planning Board regarding the petitioned zoning amendment regarding propane tanks to be considered at Town Meeting in March 2025.

The hearing will be on Thursday, 12 January 2025 at 7:00pm in Town Offices. If you have comments but cannot attend the meeting, you can mail them to zoning@lymenh.gov

Rich & Lin Brown
————-

To the Planning Board,

This Thursday, 12 Jan 2025, the Board will hold a public hearing regarding a petitioned warrant article about buried propane tanks. As the primary mover of this amendment, I come to this board as a private citizen to give you background on the article.

The Lyme Ordinance prohibits “underground fuel tanks” in the Shoreland Conservation District extending 200 feet from major water bodies (for example, Post Pond) and 100 feet from other surface waters.

This seems overbroad because it includes buried “oil” and “gas” tanks (which should be regulated because they can pollute ground water), and propane/natural gas tanks which cannot. There is no evidence that buried propane tanks can cause pollution of a water body: any leaks would simply dissipate into the atmosphere and would never be carried into the water. 

I took the opportunity to speak with David Roby, to see if there was a consideration of propane tanks when the ordinance was written. He was clear that they never considered propane tanks, and was supportive of this amendment.

In addition, there are no national codes or New Hampshire standards that regulate the placement of propane tanks near water bodies. This was confirmed by our licensed propane installer who specifically asked his instructor about national or state codes at a license renewal training.

Moreover, the NH RSA’s distinguish “oil tanks” from other natural gas/propane fuel tanks. In the section https://gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/X/146-A/146-A-2.htm, RSA 146-A:2 states: 


III. “Oil” means petroleum products and their by-products of any kind, and in any form including, but not limited to, petroleum, fuel, sludge, crude, oil refuse or oil mixed with wastes and all other liquid hydrocarbons regardless of specific gravity and which are used as motor fuel, lubricating oil, or any oil used for heating or processing. 

The term “oil” shall not include natural gas, liquified petroleum gas or synthetic natural gas regardless of derivation or source;

Furthermore the NH DES page (https://www.des.nh.gov/business-and-community/fuel-storage-tanks) also makes this distinction (see attached PDF)

Mr. Robbins has agreed that there is no risk of water contamination, and that it might make sense to change the ordinance. However was not within his power to grant an exception to the rule. A request to the ZBA for a variance also failed because of the strict prohibition on “underground fuel tanks”.

This petition (see attached PDF) is intended to remove that restriction on underground propane and natural gas tanks. It changes the language from “No underground fuel storage tanks are permitted” to the following:

Article ###: To change section 4.65-C-2 of the Lyme Zoning Ordinance to say “No underground oil storage tanks (as defined in NH RSA 146-A:2, III) are permitted. Propane and natural gas tanks are excluded from this provision.”

We should also note that our personal connection with this issue is that we do have an underground propane tank at our home on Orford Road, within the Shoreland Conservation District. (In fact, most of our home, built in 1804, is within the Shoreland Conservation District.) I realize I should have obtained a zoning permit prior to the work where this concern might have been discovered, but would still be making a request to amend the ordinance because a buried tank in that location remains the best location both for placement near the generator, as well as ease of refilling.

We look forward to the discussion on Thursday. Thank you.

Rich & Lin Brown
84 Orford Road

NH-DES-Fuel-Tanks Fuel-Tank-Petition-for-2025-Town-Meeting-2Oct2024


Feel free to share this post on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, or email. Any opinions expressed here are solely my own, and not those of any public body, such as the Lyme Planning Board, Budget Committee, or Trustees of the Trust Funds where I volunteer. I would be interested to hear your thoughts – you can reach me at richb.lyme@gmail.com.

Lyme School Budget – 11 December 2024

At the 11 December 2024 Budget Committee meeting, the School Board presented their first draft of their budget for the July 2025-June 2026 school year.

The budget shows the School plans to spend $9,536,000 in 2025-2026, a 4.79% increase from the 2024-2025 year.

Click in the document below and use the page up/down at the lower left. Or download the document from https://richb-lyme.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Lyme-School-Budget-First-draft-11Dec2024.pdf

Lyme-School-Budget-First-draft-11Dec2024


Feel free to share this post on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, or email. Any opinions expressed here are solely my own, and not those of any public body, such as the Lyme Planning Board, Budget Committee, or Trustees of the Trust Funds where I volunteer. I would be interested to hear your thoughts – you can reach me at richb.lyme@gmail.com.

Lyme Select Board budget – 9 Dec 2024

At the 11 December 2024 Budget Committee meeting, the Select Board sent their latest budget proposal. Here’s Draft #5, from 9 December 2024.

The budget shows the town plans to spend $2,937,000 in 2025, a 3.89% increase from the 2024 year.

Click in the document below and use the page up/down at the lower left. Or download the document from https://richb-lyme.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Lyme-Select-Board-budget-for2025-Draft-5-9Dec2024.pdf

Lyme-Select-Board-budget-for2025-Draft-5-9Dec2024


Feel free to share this post on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, or email. Any opinions expressed here are solely my own, and not those of any public body, such as the Lyme Planning Board, Budget Committee, or Trustees of the Trust Funds where I volunteer. I would be interested to hear your thoughts – you can reach me at richb.lyme@gmail.com.

Planning Board Housing Forums

Over the next couple months, the Lyme Planning Board will hold a series of public forums. The Board has invited experts from several organizations to talk on various aspects of housing.

10 October: Upper Valley/Lake Sunapee Regional Planning Commission, to discuss the methodology used to determine the housing needs for Lyme and the region.

24 October: Sandwich NH Planning Office, to speak to their efforts with housing, and their application to get a HOP Invest grant to pay for a consultant to give technical expertise. (Tentative)

7 November: Andrew Winter, Twin Pines Housing to speak about the opportunities and barriers to developing affordable housing. (Tentative)

14 November: Jonah Richard – a developer from Fairlee VT will speak about small-scale development, and Jamie Rogers – Margaret Pratt Community will discuss the unique characteristics of developing senior housing/continuing care. (Tentative.)

Here is the announcement from the Lyme Planning Board site for the first session:

For October 10, 2024

Dear Lyme Residents:

The Planning Board is unanimous in wanting to maintain the characteristics of Lyme that residents find so attractive. As we can all agree there is a shortage of housing in the Upper Valley.

The Planning Board is considering how Lyme might participate in solving this regional problem. We know that local employers have difficulty finding staff to fill open positions in all types of jobs. Within Lyme we are reminded that our stores, restaurants, businesses, schools and Town offices have vacancies. It is often cited that the lack of housing is an impediment to attracting workers. The Planning Board is looking at options that might help address the housing crisis.

The Upper Valley Lake Sunapee Regional Planning Commission (RPC) is our regional planning commission. They completed a recent study that suggests that the region needs 5671 housing units between 2020 and 2040. The RPC has allocated new housing units for the Upper Valley towns and figures that Lyme’s fair share goal is 145 new housing units by 2040. This represents a rate of growth at least double that which has been happening over the past 15 years.

As the Planning Board embarks on this exercise, we would like to share what we have learned and find out from you whether or how we should actively pursue incentivizing housing opportunities. As a means of introducing the subject we have invited the RPC to a public meeting to discuss the housing shortage and allocations that they have suggested. We plan to organize other opportunities to have public dialog with other experts who can help guide us in a responsible manner.

We have scheduled our first meeting with a representative of the Upper Valley Lake Sunapee Regional Planning Commission for October 10 at 7PM at the Town Office meeting room. We would very much like for Town residents to come and learn with us. Please mark your calendar so we can work together in addressing the housing issue as a community.

Individuals may also attend via zoom at: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/6808321113?pwd=K01JYjhFbVBRQ0luNDhmbjIyZEp5QT09&omn=83977525177

Pass Code : LymeZone

Sincerely,

Lyme Planning Board


Feel free to share this post on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, or email. Any opinions expressed here are solely my own, and not those of any public body, such as the Lyme Planning Board, Budget Committee, or Trustees of the Trust Funds where I volunteer. I would be interested to hear your thoughts – you can reach me at richb.lyme@gmail.com.

Lyme Ordinance Ignores Historical Development Patterns

Overview: When Lyme was originally settled, residents created lots that are far smaller than the current ordinance allows. The ordinance (passed in 1989) ignored those historical settlement patterns and de facto legislated that it be much harder to develop housing in Lyme. Today, over a third of parcels across town are non-conforming (that is, smaller than the currently-allowed minimum). 

Details:

  • In the Lyme Common District and Lyme Center District, the minimum lot size is 1 acre. However, Lyme’s historical development pattern resulted in 42% (59 of 139) of the parcels in those districts being less than 1 acre.
  • In the Rural District on a state road (Route 10, Dartmouth College Highway, North and East Thetford Roads, Dorchester Road), the minimum lot size is 3 acres. The historical pattern is that 33% (53 of 159) parcels are less than the minimum.
  • In the remainder of the Rural District, the minimum lot size is 5 acres. Traditional development resulted in 33.8% (185 of 547) parcels that are non-conforming.

How could the Lyme Ordinance be better?

What change to the “minimum lot size” would it take to make 90% of the lots conforming? That is, how could we change the ordinance so that 90% of the lots conform to the rules?

Zoning DistrictIf Lot Size changed to…Percent Conforming
Lyme Common/Lyme Center1/3 acreAbout 90%
Rural – on State Road1 acreAbout 90%
Rural – on Town Road1 acreAbout 90%
East Lyme District2/3 acreAbout 90%
Mountain/Forest District20 acresAbout 90%
Commercial/Skiway DistrictNo changeAll currently conform

Summary: A change to the Minimum Lot Size of 1/3 acre in-town, 1 acre in the Rural and East Lyme districts, and 20 acres in the Mountain/Forest district would match the historical practice of Lyme.


Feel free to share this post on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, or email. Any opinions expressed here are solely my own, and not those of any public body, such as the Lyme Planning Board, Budget Committee, or Trustees of the Trust Funds where I volunteer. I would be interested to hear your thoughts – you can reach me at richb.lyme@gmail.com.

UVLS Regional Housing Needs – methodology

I sent the following information for consideration at the 13 June 2024 Planning Board meeting:

To the Planning Board,

As requested at our last meeting, I reviewed the Upper Valley Lake Sunapee Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) from 2023. The full report is at [1]

The RHNA is a careful study of the housing needs for the region – towns in NH running from Piermont in the north down to Charleston and Washington in the south, and from the Connecticut River east to Dorchester, Grafton, and New London. See the map on page 6 of the RHNA.

The Fair Share report [2] is a readable summary of the methods used. The authors used two separate components to project housing needs.

  1. Projected Population: This uses the 2020 Census figures with the “natural growth” of the population. It also includes a factor in the early years to bring vacancy rates to 5% for rental units, and 2% for ownership units. This latter factor is designed to increase vacancy rates to a healthy level. (Currently many towns, and likely Lyme, see vacancy rates well below 1%, which means that housing prices are being driven up by scarcity.)
  2. Projected Employment: The report allocates housing growth both by population and by state-wide “Labor Market Areas”. Concord/Manchester receive a large fraction of the expected employment growth, Hanover/Lebanon are allocated a lower share because of fewer major employers, and small towns like Lyme get an even smaller share.

Lyme’s Housing Needs

Appendix E & F [3] of that report state that Lyme needs the following new housing units in the future years. These figures are approximate, but show the magnitude that’s required to serve the expected population of the town.

  • by 2025 – 52 new homes (increase of 52 new homes from 2020 to 2025)
  • by 2030 – 98 new homes (increase of 46 new homes from 2025 to 2030)
  • by 2035 – 128 new homes (increase of 30 new homes from 2030 to 2035)
  • by 2040 – 145 new homes (increase of 17 new homes from 2035 to 2040)

What about the “Keys to the Valley” report? That group produced an earlier report, based on 2010 Census information and 2016 American Community Survey update. Some of its data is now incorrect. The 2023 UVLS RHNA report uses newer data, and should be the basis for our analysis.

I asked Olivia Uyizeye from UVLSRPC to review an earlier draft of this note and I incorporated her suggestions. She offered to provide someone from the RPC to be a resource to this discussion if it would be helpful.

I look forward to our meeting this Thursday night. Thanks.

Rich Brown

[1] Full UVLS RHNA 2023 report: https://www.uvlsrpc.org/project/Regional_Housing_Needs_Assessment_2022_175/
[2] Fair Share Housing Model: https://www.uvlsrpc.org/files/6316/9420/6178/New_Hampshire_Fair_Share_Modeling_report_FINAL.pdf
[3] Appendix E&F: https://www.uvlsrpc.org/files/8516/8053/2893/UVLS_RHNA_AppE-F.pdf


Feel free to share this post on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, or email. Any opinions expressed here are solely my own, and not those of any public body, such as the Lyme Planning Board, Budget Committee, or Trustees of the Trust Funds where I volunteer. I would be interested to hear your thoughts – you can reach me at richb.lyme@gmail.com.

Housing Chapter – 11 April 2024

On Thursday, 11 April 2024, the Lyme Planning Board had a good discussion of how we should set out goals for a Housing Chapter of the Lyme Master Plan. All board members had previously submitted proposed goals. The intent is to present an initial set of goals to the residents of Lyme to get their reaction, and use that to formulate the chapter.

After the meeting, I sent this summary of my notes (appended) to David Robbins, who forwarded them to the other members of the Planning Board.

You can view the video of that meeting at: https://youtu.be/icxSjH3ZyUA


Good morning Dave,

Here are my thoughts from last night’s meeting. Would you pass them along to Vicki (and perhaps the other members)? Thanks.

  • Vicki did a terrific job of focusing our disparate thoughts. It was also helpful to hear about the process that Hanover used, and how we can use the best parts of what they did.
  • I agree that we should set out a goal of a certain number of new housing units. (Number to be determined.)
  • I accept the modification of the “kids from Lyme” goal to use criteria like “a person with a good job” should be able to find a housing option. (Income level to be determined).
  • I accept the modification of the “downsizing” goal to the more general goal of permitting multi-family dwellings. (Tim pointed out that these would likely be condos or apartments.)
  • I agree that the discussion of dimensional controls is not a goal. However, I would ask the Board to reserve time to review the existing controls (lot size, lot coverage, setbacks, conservation overlays, etc.) to see how they can help us meet our housing goals.
  • Here’s a simple statement of a Workforce Housing goal. I took it from page 3 of the UVLSRPC Housing Needs Assessment [1]. See also the Workforce Housing information at [2], and [3] below. Proposed goal:
    Lyme will comply with New Hampshire’s Workforce Housing Statute, RSA 674:58-61, which states that all municipalities must provide reasonable and realistic opportunities for the development, as well as their “fair share” of workforce housing stock.
  • We also touched briefly on “mixed use” or “planned development” that combine housing with retail/commercial space. This is a traditional development pattern in small towns (store on first floor, apartments above) that expands the ability for people to work and live in their town. Proposed goal:
    Lyme will expand the parts of town where mixed use or planned developments may be built. (Limits to be determined.)
  • We also touched on the notion of building “closer to town”. I’m not quite sure how to express this as a goal, but allowing this kind of development would help to provision town services (fire, police), health-related (Parish Nurse, home help agencies), and as a partial antidote to loneliness.
  • We should keep in mind that the Planning Board can only affect the rules that govern development. For example, although we can (and should) encourage people to build energy-efficient buildings, we have no ability to enforce or incentivize it.
  • We must avoid circular logic. I felt this was beginning to happen in the context of a “25 unit development”. It’s obvious there must be a significant septic system, which will certainly be expensive. But that’s not a justification to say, “That will be expensive, so the ordinance doesn’t need to allow that kind of use.” Instead, we should require (as we already do) that the applicant demonstrate that a state-approved system can be built, and review the rest of development to see if it meets our goals.

Thanks for a great meeting.

Rich

[1] Regional Housing Needs Assessment: https://www.uvlsrpc.org/files/4016/7700/5373/UVLS_RHNA_Final.pdf
[2] Summary of Workforce Housing Law: https://www.nhhfa.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/NH_Workforce_Housing_Law_Summary.pdf
[3] NH Workforce Housing Definition: https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXIV/674/674-58.htm


Feel free to share this post on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, or email. Any opinions expressed here are solely my own, and not those of any public body, such as the Lyme Planning Board, Budget Committee, or Trustees of the Trust Funds where I volunteer. I would be interested to hear your thoughts – you can reach me at richb.lyme@gmail.com.

Rich Brown for Planning Board

Not everyone could attend Little Town Meeting last night. Here’s what I said at the meeting:

———

Hi, my name is Rich Brown, and I am running for a seat on the Planning Board.

I live at 84 Orford Road, with my wife Lin, and a small flock of chickens. During my years as a resident of Lyme, I’ve served as a Planning Board alternate, a member of the Budget Committee, and as a Trustee of the Trust Funds. And on Wednesday mornings, I’m a crossing guard at the Lyme School.

Since 2006, I have observed and participated in Planning Board meetings. I am fully acquainted with their procedures and the issues and challenges they face. This year, we’ll consider minor updates for solar arrays and how to encourage senior and other housing options in Lyme. Most importantly, I believe the Board needs to engage with people in town to hear their ideas on how best to tackle these issues.

Thank you again for listening, and please vote for Rich Brown for Planning Board.

Vote Yes on Article 2

At last night’s Little Town Meeting, I spoke in support of Article 2 – the Solar Energy amendment.

As Tim Cook and Hebe Quinton stated, the changes to the ordinance give clear, straightforward guidelines for “small solar energy systems” of up to 2,000 square feet. These will essentially be viewed as “structures”, with the intent that an application for a solar array would be treated the same as one for a garage or barn of similar size. Medium and Large arrays (up to 1 acre, and up to 7 acres) get more stringent review. 

I encourage the Town to approve Article 2.


Feel free to share this post on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, or email. Any opinions expressed here are solely my own, and not those of any public body, such as the Lyme Planning Board, Budget Committee, or Trustees of the Trust Funds where I volunteer. I would be interested to hear your thoughts – you can reach me at richb.lyme@gmail.com.